How justified is the use of growth hormone in adulthood?
Lately I’ve been wondering how justified the use of growth hormone really is once you’re already an adult. A friend of mine started talking about it after turning forty. He said he feels more tired than before, slower recovery after workouts, and someone at his gym suggested HGH could “bring back” energy and muscle tone. That got me thinking. I know growth hormone has real medical uses, especially when there’s a diagnosed deficiency, but where is the line between treatment and just chasing anti-aging promises? It feels like a gray area. Has anyone looked into this seriously or had experience with it under medical supervision?
Re: How justified is the use of growth hormone in adulthood?
I’ve actually looked into it a bit because my uncle was diagnosed with adult growth hormone deficiency after a series of tests. In his case, it wasn’t about looking younger, it was about very low energy and other hormonal issues confirmed by doctors. From what I understand, proper diagnosis is key, and it’s not something you just “try” because you’re tired. I came across some general info on https://atoxbio.com/, while reading about biotech research and hormone-related therapies. It helped me see how complex these treatments are and how much research goes into them. Personally, I think if it’s prescribed and monitored, it can be justified. But using it casually for performance or anti-aging seems risky.
Re: How justified is the use of growth hormone in adulthood?
Reading this thread reminds me how often we look for quick solutions when we start feeling the effects of getting older. I’m not judging anyone, it’s just something I’ve noticed around me too. People try supplements, special diets, all kinds of biohacking trends. Sometimes simple things like better sleep, regular checkups, and balanced nutrition get overlooked because they’re not as exciting. Whatever someone decides, I guess it’s important to think long term and not just about short-term gains.