So, It’s been about a year and no response from Phillip, I figured as much though. But ohmygosh there is a comment, albeit a strange one. Hi Jim!

“I can't follow your logic.”

Is that because you have been indoctrinated in Christian beliefs and do everything you can to try to make the Bible sound like some sort of science textbook?
Maybe it’s just your reading comprehension?
Or maybe you’re just “crazy”?

“Everytime somebody on here disagrees with the idea of creation…”

Well here’s the thing Jimbo, if you had read my post and actually looked at Phillip’s “Hard Evidence” post to which I was referring I mentioned nothing about creation I just disputed his “Hard Evidence”. And if you had bothered to read my post I had some legitimate questions about, and alternative explanations for, his “evidence”.

“…they don't show proof to the contrary,”

First of all THEY do, and I think you know that, but you will continue to ignore anything that goes against your beliefs anyway so it doesn’t really matter.
Second, I don’t have to show proof, I was disputing the so-called evidence and giving legitimate reasons why they are not evidence.
So if you don’t like what I say then give me some proof that Phillip's “Hard Evidence” is indeed hard evidence!

The logic is perfectly clear, there are no huge jumps. If you cannot follow that logic, perhaps you shouldn't converse with people, especially about scientific evidence.