Our senses are indeed multi-dimensional, and your argument once again defeats itself. Time is the fourth dimension you refer to, yet I've heard again and again from academia that man cannot conceive the idea of infinity. That is exactly the problem I refer to in my statement. Man's conception of God, Allah, the big bang, etc. is inherently flawed because of this very shortcoming. At least you're familiar with string theory, although based on your multiple futile points,
passionate response, and self-limiting blanket statement of possessing four dimensional senses, you
have a fractured comprehension of it.

And so, in fact, many scientists are as dumb and limited as I seem to think. Even more so, now that you've weighed in to defend them. I'm a great fan of science, and of certain individuals in the field more than others. I study what I can, but do not rest on limited laurels. Take a moment to reflect on all the fallen theorists and their blind adherents of the past, dis-proven as our culture of knowledge and awareness has grown. Now place yourself 100 years in the future, looking back at silly bickering of innacuracies and trivialities. See yourself? There's Waldo!

I'm not surprised that you can respect Phillip's convictions. The difference between you is that
he has one book he blindly follows, while you have many. To put it in terms you can follow, he is the transitional fossil to your explanationus scientificus. Your type is quick to cast aside what
you refer to as "metaphysics", yet never even mumble an apology as precious String Theory begins to suggest similar truths.

I can only hope that you reflect on your final sentence, come full-circle, and decide to educate
yourself. I'm happy to debate many points, but your hostility and closed mind will bear only bitter
fruit, as evidenced by your response and general mindset.

Best regards,

Jenkie

Website: http://fightface.com

Perhaps one final point; you referenced that the design of our human vessel, and that of the hyena, could be considered flawed; indicating that they can be improved upon.
Not by you, of course, but one day man may be able to manufacture a better wheel! Once again, this strengthens my position. If we can do such a thing, why couldn't another civilization at our instance of emergence?

Intelligent design, my friend. You're next logical question in pursuit of disallowing such an idea would be

"Then who created the creators?".

Aha! Therin lies the mystery. And foward to prominence comes ideas such as string theory, spooky movement, the god particle. The now popular theory that we exist in multiple dimensions simultaneously, each of which can have their own laws and physics. I speak of the evolution of spirit, of which you currently hinder. It is for you to rise up against ridicule and derision, to step outside the boundaries of the safe and the accepted. Should we all be content to swallow what we're fed, breakthroughs would never occur, oh mediocre one.

Best,

Jenkie

Website: http://fightface.com

teh fact evolution + creation conflict is because they have 2 different theories think about it like this:
Evolution-
States Earth was fromed 4.5 Billion years ago when the Sun was formed, millions of years later the first single celled organisms appeared and progressively became more and more complex until the animals we know today and from Earth's other time zones eg Palaeozoic, Mesozoic, Cenozoic and it's gonna stay like that until something happens that forces changes in the creatures that will make them look and behave differently(a good example is swamp lions in africa, they descended from plains lion but are quite happy in swamps as well as in the plains because they developed adaptations that let them live there) until in 2 billion years time the sun explodes and destroys the planet (i'm a evolutionist, just don't think bad of me for being evolutionist and the hacker incident as i call it, i'm really a nice guy)
while-
Creationism-believes that the planet was created 2000 years BC in one week with every animal already on the planet pre-made until the apocalypse comes and destroys everything on the planet

the whole reason these two ideas conflict is because each thinks their ideas are better eg Evolutionism believes to be correct while Creationism believes it to be correct, and they're both got big political and scientific backup to keep the conflict going, but i'm not complaining, most of my friends are religious to some degree and i get along with them quite happily because of one rule we made up in our school that explains it all, however due to the sensitive nature of a certain word i'll edit that word into something a bit more suitable:
DILLIGAD ©(originally DILLIGAF ©)
Do
I
Look
Like
I
Give
A
****
It means we just don' care because it don't matter really

Arbiter Gruntsmasher ©
anyone caught copyrighting that saying will be fed to the most scariest of pokemon, level 19 Magikarp 1 xp away from levelling up a swarm of about 100,000